11/28/2022

Coaching a Year One Team In College

By Seyi Matthew
After 4 games, 17 goals conceded and 3 goals scored, I am beginning to feel the pressure that comes with coaching a team. Not that there are high expectations of a team that was just newly formed about a month ago, but the feeling that you are not pulling in the right direction as a coach. It's an issue of personal scrutiny.

I decided to go into football coaching after playing as a right back in my second year in college and then, I was introduced to a football lover who had gathered year one college students to form a football team. All that was left was a coach who would mould the team into a formidable one and of course, I landed the job.

This is how the league works in my college. There are six teams in the league - Panthers, Stars, Wolves, Spurs, Hale End and the team that I am in charge of, Young Boys FC. Panthers and Stars are year four teams and mostly have players who have been playing together for about four years now. Wolves are a year three team, Spurs and Hale End are year two teams while my club has players that have just known each other for barely three months. This is not to make light of the zero points accumulated after four games but it is the reality of the club's situation.

Being novel to the coaching set up, I started to learn about training drills as all I knew about beforehand was football tactics. In coaching, you have to make your team fit. You begin to introduce different forms of drills that would ensure that your players are physically ready for every game. There is the mental aspect as well. You have to make sure your 23-man squad is in an ideal mental state. I constantly remind my players that there is no pressure as they are in their first year and that too much isn't expected from them. Whether that is an encouraging reminder or not, I cannot tell. Not yet. 
There are times in training that fights break out among the players and as a coach, you just have to make sure it is resolved as soon as possible. You don't want your squad harmony disrupted.

I started our first match against Stars in a defensive 4-3-2-1 formation. The aim was not to win, but to showcase the talents and skills of my players and yes, my tactical acumen. We were trashed 7-2, the players didn't follow my tactical instructions, they kept falling out of positions, they created another formation on the pitch and the only excuse I could make for them was that they had relatively little football intelligence. 

The next training session was about passing triangles and the importance of creating triangles while passing. While training, I constantly shout when I'm speaking so that everyone hears me clearly and understand the importance of what I'm talking about. Sometimes, you are irritated by the sluggishness and indifferent behaviors your players portray in training and other times, you are impressed by their output and you believe you are doing a great job. It's an issue of back and forth.

Our next match was against Wolves, a very highly coordinated team. Safe to say, the most coordinated team in the college's league off and on the pitch. I once played for Wolves in my second year but they were formerly called Vallse and now, they have fresh blood and are under new management. The formation for this match was a 4-2-3-1. The aim was to attack and to show no signs of respect for the opponents. It was 0-0 at half time and everyone was impressed. I was impressed. The team owners were impressed. The players showed that they were up to the task but after two major goalkeeping errors, we lost 2-0. It was a very interesting game with frequent attacking threats from both sides and the high tempo made it a game to remember. We signed a player from year three after that game because he thought this was a team he could enjoy playing in. 
Our next match was against Hale End who had been playing really poor and we were favourites to win that game 4-0 or 5-1 but we lost. We lost 0-1 and it was a sorry case. We still had 0 points after we could have picked up a point from the year-two team. It was like the world came crashing down. People beginning to say things all around you. "Why did you start him"?, "Why didn't you stick to the previous formation"? and so on. I wonder how the pressure is for coaches when their world class teams lose. 

Oh, I forgot to mention that a player on my bench walked out on the team after I substituted in a particular player in the match against Stars FC. He claimed the player wasn't good enough to be playing in the league games. There are times when you are faced with issues of man management. You want to satisfy this player, that player, every player. I had a tète à tète with  the player that walked out because he is a very skilled player. I still wanted him to be a part of the team despite the awful attitude he pulled off. After a talk that seemed productive due to the fact that he said he would stay, he still left the team for Panthers. I don't blame him. Who wouldn't want to play for the year four team? It's an issue of choice.

Pardon me as I also forgot to mention how Stars FC wanted to buy two of my key players on the transfer deadline day. One of the players involved is the captain of the team. The last hour of the deadline, I had a meeting with the management of Stars and they tried to persuade me to sell the two players they wanted. They mentioned that they like the way they play on the pitch. I refused. It was a straight no. Besides, the offer they put down wasn't inviting at all. They spoke to the players to try to force their way out of the team, but neither of my players wanted to leave. I was scared for a moment though.

Our last match was against Panthers. It ended 7-1. The player that left us to join them played the whole 90 minutes. The team looked unmotivated. They played slowly. I could sense tension building up between some of my players and now, I have to find a way to restore squad harmony to its ideal state.
With some players complaining about playing time, some complaining about the league's officiating, some feeling left out, some becoming relaxed and uninterested and possibly some feeling too important, it is important that I step in to set all of these in order if the team is going to progress at all.

Our next match is against Spurs and its a very special one for me as I face a fellow coach who happens to be a close acquaintance. This is his second year of coaching Spurs and so I guess it's an issue of no pressure.

10/06/2022

Crystal Palace: What Has Changed Really?

By Matthew
06 October, 2022 • 1:45 GMT

I have found Crystal Palace pretty interesting ever since former Arsenal Midfielder, Patrick Viera, took over at the south london club. When he became Head Coach at Selhurst Park, every palace fan was expecting a revolution. I was expecting one as well. The club had been previously managed by a very conservative and pragmatic Roy Hodgson. Roy would have palace sit deep in a  4-4-2 formation, capitalise on opponents mistakes, turn possession over, counter and then, of course, pass the ball to Zaha - who desperately wanted out of the club at some point.
As expected, the Viera revolution is here. Attacking football left, right and center. Players showing off their dribbling prowess and the team now pressing than ever. What I, personally, find interesting is how this attacking revolution has not really translated into points and a much higher league table finish for Palace. Last season, they finished in 12th place with 48 points. The season before, they finished in 14th place with 44 points and in Roy Hodgson's penultimate season, they finished 14th with 43 points. So what has really changed for good since Viera's appointment in July 2021? Fans who like their team playing entertaining football are definitely enjoying what they see compared to the past few seasons but what major impact has this 'positive football' had?

One thing that catches the eye is how Palace have turned to younger players. In the 2021/22 season, the Crystal Palace board seriously began to focus on recruiting younger players. They had also spent around £20 million pounds on their academy. What they really did was to not renew expired contracts of more than 9 squad players and then, they went after fresh legs.
In the 2019/20 season, the average age of the club's squad was 29.4 years old. In the 2020/21 season, it was 29.1 years. Coinciding with when Viera came in, the average age dropped significantly to 27.1 years and presently this season, it's at 27.6. Marc Guehi, Conor Gallagher (loan, now returned back to Chelsea), Michael Olise et al. were among the young players that landed at Selhurst Park.
Just for the records, I was obsessed with Gallagher at some point last season.

With younger players sticking around, one would presume that the team's pressing intensity should practically increase but what do the stats tell us?
In the 2019/20 season, Crystal Palace had attempted 6252 pressures and won just 1698 leaving the success rate at 27.2%. The next season, they attempted 5700 pressures, won 1502, and had a success rate of 26.4%. Last season, when the average age dropped, they attempted 6041 pressures, won 1809 and had a success rate of 30%. This statistic provided is merely a descriptive one and we can't really deduce too much from it, as it is lacking some form of context. But what we can see from it is that last season was the period the team had the best success rate in applying pressures on opponent teams compared to the previous two.

Image Credit: Crystal Palace Football Club

Let's look into the currency of football - goals.
Crystal Palace scored 50 goals last season. The three clubs that immediately sat above them on the league table - Brighton, Wolves and Newcastle - scored 42, 38 and 44 goals respectively.
Crystal Palace scored 39 goals two seasons ago (excluding own goals).
Three seasons ago, they scored just 29 goals (excluding own goals).
Since the Viera era began, there is no doubt that Crystal Palace having been finding the net more often than when they were under Roy Hodgson. But another metric to scrutinise is the expected goals metric (xG). xG can tell us the amount of goals a team is supposed to score and then we can compare it with with the number the team actually scored.

The season with the 50 goals scored, they had an xG of 50 goals. This means that Palace clinically made do with the chances they created. The season with the 39 goals scored, they had an xG of 35 goals. This means that Palace scored 4 more goals than they should have. The season with the 29 goals had an xG of 34. It is evident that in Viera's pioneer season, the team created more chances than they did in Roy's last two seasons. An xG of 50 compared to 35 and 34 means Palace are truly a more attacking side. They are creating more chances than they did under their former manager. That is a fact! But anyways, with the team more interesting going forward, the defence haven't really Improved too much and aren't really different from the Crystal Palace of two or three seasons ago. Unfortunately, they concede too many goals. Maybe this provides the answer to why the Veira revolution hasn't picked up many points as I, personally, feel they should be picking.

Note: All statistical data provided are for the Premier league only, doesn’t include any other competition Crystal Palace partake in and are provided as at the time of writing.